Salem's Lot: The Frustratingly Average Tale of Stephen King's Vampires

The Enduring Legacy of 'Salem's Lot

In 1975, Stephen King published his second novel, "Salem's Lot," cementing his place in the world of horror literature. The novel has since been adapted into two miniseries (1979 and 2004) and multiple short stories, with the latest attempt being the 2024 film directed by Gary Dauberman. Dauberman's take on King's classic tale of vampires infesting a small Maine town is the first feature-length adaptation, and while it is aggressively average, it sparks interesting discussions about the nature of adaptation and the essence of King's horror.

A Rushed but Faithful Adaptation

The 2024 film, also titled "Salem's Lot," sees writer Ben Mears (played by Lewis Pullman) return to his hometown of Jerusalem's Lot in search of inspiration. Upon arrival, Mears discovers the residents are being attacked by a bloodthirsty vampire, Marsten. The plot closely follows King's novel, with some scenes feeling like faithful adaptations. However, the rushed pacing and poor editing make it hard to connect with the characters and become invested in their struggles.

The Elusive Character of Larry Crockett

One of the most fascinating aspects of "Salem's Lot" is the character of Larry Crockett, a sleazy and morally bankrupt individual who embodies the small-town evils that draw in the vampire. Unfortunately, none of the adaptations have done Crockett justice, and the 2024 film is no exception. Dauberman's take on Crockett is reduced to a minor character, stripping away the complexities and nuances that make him so intriguing in the novel.

Original Cut and Creative Choices

In an interview, Dauberman revealed that his original cut of the movie ran for three hours and included the iconic opening scene at Marsten House, which was unfortunately cut from the final version. The missing scenes and character developments have sparked debates among fans, with some arguing that the longer version would have been more faithful to King's novel. Dauberman's version of "Salem's Lot" is an entertaining ride, but it feels like the filmmakers played it safe, shying away from the more atmospheric and suspenseful elements that made King's novel so terrifying.

The Original Sin of Adapting 'Salem's Lot

The biggest problem with "Salem's Lot" is its poor pacing and shallow character development. With a two-hour runtime, Dauberman tries to cram in as much of King's story as possible, resulting in a frenetic and disjointed viewing experience. As Roger Ebert pointed out, even at almost two hours, the film feels hysterically rushed, with scenes picking up halfway through and segues to mark the passage of time missing entirely.

Avoiding Adaptation Fatigue

Stephen King's works are vast and prolific, with many adaptations having already been made. However, each adaptation presents a new opportunity to revisit and reinterpret the source material. Despite its shortcomings, the 2024 film is a testament to the enduring appeal of King's stories. Fans of King will continue to flock to adaptations, eager to experience their favorite tales reimagined for the screen.

#Entertainment